The question has lingered for years, fuelling fierce public debate on both sides of the Atlantic: should Prince Harry and Meghan Markle be granted automatic, taxpayer-funded security once again?
The question has lingered for years, fuelling fierce public debate on both sides of the Atlantic: should Prince Harry and Meghan Markle be granted automatic, taxpayer-funded security once again? Now, after a high-level review involving senior royal advisers, government representatives and security officials, a clear and official decision has been made — bringing an end, at least for now, to months of speculation. And the details of the meeting reveal just how carefully — and controversially — the matter was weighed.
You’ve read the headlines and heard our experts’ opinions – but what do YOU think?
Have your say on one of the biggest royal stories of the week by answering our poll below.
In this week’s poll, after sources close to the Sussexes told The Mail on Sunday that Prince Harry could receive taxpayer-funded armed security during his next UK visit, we ask: should his and Meghan Markle‘s automatic police protection be restored?
Want more of the Mail’s unrivalled royals journalism, straight from some of the world’s leading experts on the monarchy?
We’ll bring together the most knowledgeable voices, gorgeous photography and exclusive insider commentary to expose the truth behind polished public appearances, and reveal the very human drama at the heart of this extraordinary institution.