Questions Swirl Around Meghan Markle’s “As Ever” Brand After Reports
Just Now: Questions Swirl Around Meghan Markle’s “As Ever” Brand After Reports of Product Returns and Confusion Over Wickless Candle Claims
A luxury brand built on royal-adjacent prestige and promises of meticulous craftsmanship is facing a catastrophic consumer revolt as a flood of returns and scathing customer reviews expose profound quality failures. The American Riviera Orchard venture, spearheaded by Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex, is reeling from reports of defective, underwhelming, and potentially deceptive products reaching customers.
Multiple buyers have received the brand’s signature $64 candle completely devoid of a wick, rendering the product functionally useless and creating a stark metaphor for the venture itself. This is not an isolated incident but a pattern, with numerous customers across different orders reporting the same glaring manufacturing defect.
The problems extend far beyond candles. Customer testimonials detail a litany of issues: jars of $36 strawberry jam arriving underfilled with contents so runny they pour like syrup; labels applied crookedly on both front and back; and tea that smells fragrant but brews into “barely flavored water.” Decorative dried flowers, a key branding element, have been described as brown, wilted, and resembling forgotten potpourri.

Perhaps most damaging are allegations of white-label sourcing that contradict the brand’s premium image. The “Sussex Sprinkles,” marketed as an edible floral garnish, have been identified by small pet owners as identical to dried flower mixes sold as rabbit and guinea pig treats. The brand’s wine is alleged to be sourced from bulk suppliers of inexpensive corporate promotional wine, then rebottled and sold with a significant markup.
These revelations are compounded by the brand’s utilization of the phrase “As Ever,” which was trademarked for the venture. The phrase holds deep personal significance, as it was the closing signature used by the late Princess Diana in her private correspondence. Its commercial application on jams and candles has sparked intense criticism regarding taste and exploitation of legacy.
The brand’s official policy states returns are not accepted due to the nature of the consumable goods. Despite this, a significant volume of returns is reportedly inundating operations, with many items sent back unopened—a clear indicator of immediate customer rejection upon inspecting the product’s presentation and perceived value.
This market feedback presents a direct challenge to the brand’s foundational claim of a “freakish attention to detail.” The contrast with established royal ventures is striking. Comparable products from Highgrove, the King’s charitable estate, are sold at lower price points with all profits directed to charity, and are consistently reviewed as higher in quality.
The situation escalated following a high-profile endorsement from media titan Oprah Winfrey, who included the brand’s marmalade on her coveted “Favorite Things” list. Notably, even this unparalleled promotional boost failed to generate a sell-out, suggesting a deep-seated consumer skepticism that transcends marketing reach.
Industry analysts observe that the crisis stems from a fundamental disconnect between elite branding and tangible product execution. In the digital age, where customers instantly share experiences, a failure to meet premium promises with consistent quality is rapidly and publicly exposed. The wickless candle has become an indelible symbol of this gap.
The mounting returns and vocal customer dissatisfaction represent a pure market verdict. They indicate that aspirational pricing and carefully curated imagery are insufficient without genuine substance, rigorous quality control, and transparent sourcing. The brand now faces the arduous task of addressing these systemic failures.

Customer service channels are reportedly overwhelmed with complaints and return requests that contravene official policy. This logistical and reputational storm threatens not only immediate sales but the long-term viability of the entire lifestyle empire ambition. Trust, once broken on this scale, is exceptionally difficult to rebuild.
The unfolding scenario serves as a cautionary tale for celebrity-driven ventures entering the saturated luxury goods market. It underscores that a famous name can generate initial curiosity, but sustained success is irrevocably tied to product integrity, consumer respect, and delivering value that justifies the price.
As returns continue and social media amplifies customer discontent, the focus shifts to the brand’s response. Whether it will address quality control, sourcing transparency, and customer compensation remains unclear. The market has delivered its initial, harsh judgment; the business must now decide if it can adapt to meet it.