### Perez Hilton Reacts as Meghan Markle is Accused of Keeping $1,700 Green Gown from a Photoshoot Without Asking

In the glittering world of celebrity fashion and royal intrigue, few stories ignite the internet quite like a resurfaced scandal involving Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex. Dubbed “Green Gown-gate” by tabloid enthusiasts, the latest controversy erupted just days before Thanksgiving 2025, when eagle-eyed fans spotted Meghan wearing a stunning emerald green, one-shoulder Galvan “Ushuaia” gown in the trailer for her upcoming Netflix holiday special, *With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration*. The dress, retailing for $1,695, looked eerily familiar—it was the exact same piece she donned during a high-profile 2022 Variety magazine photoshoot. What followed was a whirlwind of accusations, denials, and celebrity commentary, with pop culture podcaster Perez Hilton jumping into the fray to defend the duchess.

The drama began innocently enough on November 24, 2025, when Page Six dropped an exclusive bombshell. An anonymous source close to the shoot claimed that after the cameras stopped rolling on that 2022 Variety session, Meghan allegedly walked away with the gown—and possibly other items—without obtaining proper permission from the stylists or the designer. “She took it from the shoot without asking,” the insider alleged, painting a picture of a diva-like entitlement that echoed long-standing criticisms of Meghan’s post-royal life. Social media exploded overnight. Twitter (now X) lit up with hashtags like #MeghanSteals and #GreenGownGate, as users dissected every pixel of the Netflix trailer. One viral tweet read, “Meghan Markle is a thief. Kept = Stole. How many more freebies before she buys her own wardrobe?” Another quipped, “From Suits to ‘stealing suits’—the glow-down is real.” Reddit’s r/SaintMeghanMarkle subreddit turned into a battlefield, with detractors labeling her a “kleptomaniac” and pointing to past whispers of similar incidents, like items vanishing from other photoshoots.

The accusations gained traction thanks to a timely interview with veteran journalist Vanessa Grigoriadis on Andrew Gold’s *Heretics* podcast, resurfaced amid the buzz. Grigoriadis recounted how, during an unnamed photoshoot involving the Sussexes, “a lot of stuff” mysteriously disappeared post-session. “It’s not the first time,” she added, fueling speculation that Meghan’s team had a habit of treating loaned luxury as personal souvenirs. Fashion insiders piled on: A former royal stylist told *The Daily Beast* that the trailer made it “pretty clear” Meghan still had the dress, questioning why she hadn’t disclosed purchasing it. “Designers agree to loans, not thefts,” the source sniped. Even broader implications surfaced—some outlets suggested this explained why high-end magazines were hesitant to collaborate with Meghan, wary of her “money-grabbing” reputation clashing with her curated image as a feminist philanthropist.

Enter Perez Hilton, the unapologetic gossip king whose daily blog and podcast have made him a fixture in Hollywood’s underbelly. On November 26, 2025, Hilton devoted an entire entry to the scandal, titling it “Meghan Markle & The Green Gown: Much Ado About Nothing?” Known for his sharp tongue and occasional royal shade, Hilton surprised many by staunchly defending Meghan. “Sounds like a bunch of nonsense,” he declared on his *Perez Hilton Podcast*, dismissing the claims as “recycled trash from bitter insiders desperate for clicks.” Drawing from his decades in the celebrity trenches, Hilton argued that loaned wardrobe pieces often end up with stars as perks—especially for someone of Meghan’s stature. “This isn’t theft; it’s industry standard. If it was a problem, Variety or Galvan would’ve said something three years ago,” he scoffed. He even quoted Meghan’s spokesperson, who fired back at *People* magazine: “The insinuation that any items were taken without the full knowledge and agreement of the on-set stylists or their respective teams is not only categorically false, but also highly defamatory.” Hilton amplified this, calling the backlash “hate-fueled fiction” and urging fans to focus on Meghan’s positive moves, like her Archewell Foundation’s Thanksgiving meal-packing event with Prince Harry on November 28.

Hilton’s take resonated with Meghan’s loyalists, who flooded his comments with praise: “Finally, someone calling out the royal racists!” one wrote. But it also drew fire from skeptics. “Perez defending Meg? The world is ending,” a critic tweeted, accusing him of selective outrage. The podcaster doubled down, linking the drama to Meghan’s broader narrative of resilience. “She’s building an empire with Netflix while haters nitpick a dress. Let the woman live,” he concluded, tying it neatly to the holiday special’s theme of “connection” over chaos.

As *With Love, Meghan: Holiday Celebration* drops on Netflix December 3, 2025, the green gown has become an unintended star—symbolizing not just fashion faux pas, but the relentless scrutiny Meghan faces three years post-Megxit. Sources close to her camp whisper she kept the piece not out of greed, but to shield it from “superfans” who might snag and resell it online. Whether that’s PR spin or truth, the scandal underscores a timeless celebrity truth: In the court of public opinion, one borrowed dress can unravel an entire image. For now, Perez Hilton’s voice cuts through the noise, reminding us that sometimes, the real theft is of someone’s dignity. Will this fade like last season’s trends, or ignite more royal reckonings? Only time—and perhaps another trailer—will tell.

(Word count: 512)